It just does not fit. There are millions of atheists and agnostics, as well as people of various religions, degrees of spiritual beliefs, and they all have rights to their choices in abortion and euthanasia, too. Many Christians who believe in euthanasia justify it by reasoning that the God whom they worship is loving and tolerant and would not wish to see them in agony. They do not see their God as being so vengeful as refusing them the Kingdom of Heaven if they accelerated the end of their life to avoid prolonged, unbearable suffering.
Another consideration must be that, by checking out before the Grim Reaper routinely calls, is one depriving oneself of a valuable period of quality life? Is that last period of love and companionship with family and friends worth hanging on for? Our critics heavily use the argument that this is the case.
In my twenty years in this movement, and being aware of many hundreds of self-deliverances, I can attest that even the most determined supporters of euthanasia hang on until the last minute -- sometimes too long, and lose control.
The wiser ones gather with their families and friends to say good-byes; there are important reunions and often farewell parties. There is closure of wounds and familial gaps just the same as if the person was dying naturally - perhaps more so since the exact timing of the death is known.
Euthanasia supporters enjoy life and love living, and their respect for the sanctity of life is as strong as anybody's: They are willing, if their dying is distressing to them, to forego a few weeks or a few days at the very end and expire at a time of their choice. Moreover, they are not the types to worry what the neighbors will think. There is another rightist argument that the acceptance of euthanasia practices will quickly destroy the traditional bond of trust between doctor and patient; that the patient will never know if the doctor is going to kill them or not; that commercialized medical practices will jump at the chance to get rid of long-term patients who are short of insurance funding.
Those arguments have been answered by the 20 years euthanasia has been practiced in the Netherlands, and by the nearly three years physician-assisted suicide has been available in Oregon. No evidence of a breakdown in relationships has emerged.
Those doctors who are ethically opposed to hastening the end of life just don't do it. The laws in the Netherlands, Oregon, and the ones which have failed to pass, all give medical professionals the right to refuse to be involved -- a conscience clause.
This exemption will always be so as far as I am concerned. In fact, many patients hold their medical advisors in higher regard if they know that he or she will go to great lengths to keep them from terminal suffering, even to the extent of providing, if necessary, a gracious final exit. What people often do not realize is that, for many, just knowing how to kill themselves is itself of great comfort. It gives them the assurance to fight harder and therefore often extends lives just a bit longer.
Many people have remarked to me that my book, 'Final Exit' is the best insurance policy they've ever taken out. Once such people know how to make a certain and dignified deliverance, with loved ones supporting them, they will often renegotiate the timing of their death. For example, a man in his 90s called to tell me his health was so bad he was ready to terminate his life.
I advised him to read 'Final Exit,' which he did and he called me back. He had managed to get hold of lethal drugs from a friendly doctor and so everything was in position. Now he had the knowledge, the drugs, and encouraged by the control and choice now in his grasp, he had negotiated new terms with himself concerning his fate.
Surely, for those who want this way, this is commendable and is in fact an extension rather than a curtailment of life's span. Thanks to the work in the last century of a forceful right-to-die movement, a hidden reality has emerged about terminal suffering, indicating that the time has come for change. What are needed now are laws permitting voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide surrounded with a bodyguard of rules -- but not so many that the patient in unable to jump through all the hoops.
With the inevitability of gradualness, as the idea takes hold amongst rising generations, reform will undoubtedly come. We who believe must ceaselessly work for it. The above essay may be reproduced for scholarly purposes without permission being sought, provided source acknowledgement is given.
Reproduction in any journal or book must have the author's permission. Good Life, Good Death. Books by Derek Humphry. Google News assisted suicide. Yahoo News assisted suicide. Right to Die Organizations. Oregon Assisted Suicide Law. Assisted-Dying Blog by Derek Humphry. An essay by Derek Humphry The movement for choice in dying is dedicated to the view that there are at least two forms of suicide.
Word origins and euphemisms The word 'euthanasia' comes from the Greek -- Eu, "good", and Thanatos, "death". Suicide, self-deliverance, auto-euthanasia, aid-in-dying, assisted suicide, physician-assisted suicide, physician-assisted dying -- call it what you like -- can be justified by the average supporter of the right to die movement for the following reasons: Advanced terminal illness that is causing unbearable suffering - combined physical and psychic -- to the individual despite good medical care.
This is the most common reason to seek an early end. And as Oregon research has shown, being a burden to others is an additional factor. Total loss of quality of life due to protracted, incurable medical conditions. Ninety minutes later, with his wife by his side, the year old died peacefully. According to his wife, when he took the drugs his body was ready and he fell deeply asleep, almost immediately.
In , Oregon passed a state law legalizing physician assisted suicide. A resident of Oregon who has been determined mentally competent by two doctors and has less than six months to live can request prescription medication for the purpose of ending his or her life.
However, a physician may not administer the drug. Those opposing this law expected masses to flood the Oregon healthcare system when the law passed. Approximately equal amounts of the were men and women. Seventy percent of these people had malignant cancer, eighty-six percent were enrolled in a hospice program and ninety-eight percent of these people were white.
Well as defined by medicinenet. This is different from euthanasia where the physician is the one who provides and administers the drug that ends the life of the patient with a painful or incurable disease, which is also called a mercy killing.
Currently there are three states in the U. Washington was the second state to follow in , with Initiative Measure No. The first requirement is that the patient is an adult, so they have to be over the age of Second, they have to be competent. This requires that the patients physicians, and psychiatrists or the court, have the opinion that the patient can make informed decisions on their own health care.
Third, the patient must have a terminal illness as confirmed by their physician. Fourth, they must voluntarily express that they would like medication to end their life. Fifth, they must also make a written request for medication that will help end their life so to be tracked by the state government. Finally they must meet requirements of citizenship for that state. All of these requirements must be met in order to qualify; they do not meet qualifications solely on age and disability.
Also the statutes do require that the doctor recommend counseling, have them notifying a family member, and inform them of the risks and probable results as well as feasible alternatives.
Montana is the third state that has a physician assisted suicide law.
Physician-Assisted Suicide Machele Carter Informal Logic PHI Instructor Jason Lum May 19, The argument over physician-assisted suicide (PAS) and the right-to-die movement has plagued American society, for decades.
Jul 28, · Physician assisted suicide should be a legal option for terminally ill patients throughout the United States. This is a humane way for the terminally ill to end their lives with dignity and without the shame and suffering.
SAMPLE ARGUMENTATION ESSAY Research Question: Should assisted suicide be legal? Assisted Suicide: Rights and Responsibilities A woman suffering from cancer became the first person known to die under the law on physician-assisted suicide in the state of Oregon when she took a . Free Argumentative Essays: Euthanasia is Inhuman - Euthanasia is Inhuman A subject that has been disputed more ever since medical technology has dramatically improved is Euthanasia. Euthanasia is assisted suicide, or it could be ending a patience's suffering by letting him die.
Abstract Reported cases of suicide due to terminal illness have been on the rise. Today, there are several terminal diseases that plague our community. Key among these terminal diseases includes cancer and diabetes. Adult patients have always considered the option of terminating their lives so as to avert the suffering that comes with the disease. - Physician assisted suicide Physician assisted suicide, a suicide made possible by a physician providing a patient with the means to kill themselves, and euthanasia, the kindness of taking individual life by the physician, is an extremely debatable topic.